A comparison of iterative methods to solve complex valued linear algebraic systems (Q403093): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
This overview and analysis of various iterative methods to solve sparse complex linear equations includes both preconditioning and splitting methods as well as extensive and detailed tests and numerical experiments. In general, it is advisable to replace a sparse complex linear system \(Cz = h \in \mathbb C^n\) by a \(2n\) by \(2n\) real system such as \( \begin{bmatrix} A & -B\\B & A \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} f\\g \end{pmatrix}\) or \( \begin{bmatrix} B & -A\\A & B \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\-y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} g\\f \end{pmatrix}\) where \(C = A + iB, \;z = x+iy\) and \(h = f+ig\) and all right hand entries in the last three equations are real, except for \(i = \sqrt{-1}\). The advice in the conclusions section should be heeded by anyone in need solving complex sparse linear systems.
Property / review text: This overview and analysis of various iterative methods to solve sparse complex linear equations includes both preconditioning and splitting methods as well as extensive and detailed tests and numerical experiments. In general, it is advisable to replace a sparse complex linear system \(Cz = h \in \mathbb C^n\) by a \(2n\) by \(2n\) real system such as \( \begin{bmatrix} A & -B\\B & A \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} f\\g \end{pmatrix}\) or \( \begin{bmatrix} B & -A\\A & B \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\-y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} g\\f \end{pmatrix}\) where \(C = A + iB, \;z = x+iy\) and \(h = f+ig\) and all right hand entries in the last three equations are real, except for \(i = \sqrt{-1}\). The advice in the conclusions section should be heeded by anyone in need solving complex sparse linear systems. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Frank Uhlig / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65F10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65F50 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65F08 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65F30 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65-02 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65E05 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6335812 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
complex linear equation
Property / zbMATH Keywords: complex linear equation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
complex symmetric system
Property / zbMATH Keywords: complex symmetric system / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
preconditioning
Property / zbMATH Keywords: preconditioning / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
splitting method
Property / zbMATH Keywords: splitting method / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
numerical test
Property / zbMATH Keywords: numerical test / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
sparse matrix
Property / zbMATH Keywords: sparse matrix / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 16:49, 29 June 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A comparison of iterative methods to solve complex valued linear algebraic systems
scientific article

    Statements

    A comparison of iterative methods to solve complex valued linear algebraic systems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    29 August 2014
    0 references
    This overview and analysis of various iterative methods to solve sparse complex linear equations includes both preconditioning and splitting methods as well as extensive and detailed tests and numerical experiments. In general, it is advisable to replace a sparse complex linear system \(Cz = h \in \mathbb C^n\) by a \(2n\) by \(2n\) real system such as \( \begin{bmatrix} A & -B\\B & A \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} f\\g \end{pmatrix}\) or \( \begin{bmatrix} B & -A\\A & B \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\-y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} g\\f \end{pmatrix}\) where \(C = A + iB, \;z = x+iy\) and \(h = f+ig\) and all right hand entries in the last three equations are real, except for \(i = \sqrt{-1}\). The advice in the conclusions section should be heeded by anyone in need solving complex sparse linear systems.
    0 references
    0 references
    complex linear equation
    0 references
    complex symmetric system
    0 references
    preconditioning
    0 references
    splitting method
    0 references
    numerical test
    0 references
    sparse matrix
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references