A comparison of iterative methods to solve complex valued linear algebraic systems (Q403093): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Changed an Item |
||
| Property / review text | |||
This overview and analysis of various iterative methods to solve sparse complex linear equations includes both preconditioning and splitting methods as well as extensive and detailed tests and numerical experiments. In general, it is advisable to replace a sparse complex linear system \(Cz = h \in \mathbb C^n\) by a \(2n\) by \(2n\) real system such as \( \begin{bmatrix} A & -B\\B & A \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} f\\g \end{pmatrix}\) or \( \begin{bmatrix} B & -A\\A & B \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\-y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} g\\f \end{pmatrix}\) where \(C = A + iB, \;z = x+iy\) and \(h = f+ig\) and all right hand entries in the last three equations are real, except for \(i = \sqrt{-1}\). The advice in the conclusions section should be heeded by anyone in need solving complex sparse linear systems. | |||
| Property / review text: This overview and analysis of various iterative methods to solve sparse complex linear equations includes both preconditioning and splitting methods as well as extensive and detailed tests and numerical experiments. In general, it is advisable to replace a sparse complex linear system \(Cz = h \in \mathbb C^n\) by a \(2n\) by \(2n\) real system such as \( \begin{bmatrix} A & -B\\B & A \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} f\\g \end{pmatrix}\) or \( \begin{bmatrix} B & -A\\A & B \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\-y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} g\\f \end{pmatrix}\) where \(C = A + iB, \;z = x+iy\) and \(h = f+ig\) and all right hand entries in the last three equations are real, except for \(i = \sqrt{-1}\). The advice in the conclusions section should be heeded by anyone in need solving complex sparse linear systems. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / reviewed by | |||
| Property / reviewed by: Frank Uhlig / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65F10 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65F50 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65F08 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65F30 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65-02 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65E05 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
| Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6335812 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
complex linear equation | |||
| Property / zbMATH Keywords: complex linear equation / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
complex symmetric system | |||
| Property / zbMATH Keywords: complex symmetric system / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
preconditioning | |||
| Property / zbMATH Keywords: preconditioning / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
splitting method | |||
| Property / zbMATH Keywords: splitting method / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
numerical test | |||
| Property / zbMATH Keywords: numerical test / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
sparse matrix | |||
| Property / zbMATH Keywords: sparse matrix / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 16:49, 29 June 2023
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A comparison of iterative methods to solve complex valued linear algebraic systems |
scientific article |
Statements
A comparison of iterative methods to solve complex valued linear algebraic systems (English)
0 references
29 August 2014
0 references
This overview and analysis of various iterative methods to solve sparse complex linear equations includes both preconditioning and splitting methods as well as extensive and detailed tests and numerical experiments. In general, it is advisable to replace a sparse complex linear system \(Cz = h \in \mathbb C^n\) by a \(2n\) by \(2n\) real system such as \( \begin{bmatrix} A & -B\\B & A \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} f\\g \end{pmatrix}\) or \( \begin{bmatrix} B & -A\\A & B \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\-y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} g\\f \end{pmatrix}\) where \(C = A + iB, \;z = x+iy\) and \(h = f+ig\) and all right hand entries in the last three equations are real, except for \(i = \sqrt{-1}\). The advice in the conclusions section should be heeded by anyone in need solving complex sparse linear systems.
0 references
complex linear equation
0 references
complex symmetric system
0 references
preconditioning
0 references
splitting method
0 references
numerical test
0 references
sparse matrix
0 references