Pages that link to "Item:Q1028909"
From MaRDI portal
The following pages link to On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms (Q1028909):
Displaying 43 items.
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation (Q2321325) (← links)
- A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation (Q2321336) (← links)
- Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey (Q2341832) (← links)
- On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics (Q2344367) (← links)
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks (Q2353975) (← links)
- A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks (Q2374549) (← links)
- Rethinking specificity in defeasible reasoning and its effect in argument reinstatement (Q2401637) (← links)
- An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning (Q2409094) (← links)
- A QBF-based formalization of abstract argumentation semantics (Q2446545) (← links)
- A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making (Q2447172) (← links)
- A general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation (Q2680804) (← links)
- Burdens of persuasion and standards of proof in structured argumentation (Q2695505) (← links)
- Base argumentation as an abstraction of deductive argumentation (Q2695535) (← links)
- Goal-based theory evaluation (Q2769721) (← links)
- Opposition Frameworks (Q2835871) (← links)
- Correct Grounded Reasoning with Presumptive Arguments (Q2835892) (← links)
- Extending a Temporal Defeasible Argumentation Framework with Possibilistic Weights (Q2915075) (← links)
- Beyond Maxi-Consistent Argumentation Operators (Q2915089) (← links)
- Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Semantics Based on Conflict-Free Sets (Q3011933) (← links)
- Backing and Undercutting in Defeasible Logic Programming (Q3011934) (← links)
- Five Weaknesses of ASPIC + (Q3143396) (← links)
- Principles Of Talmudic Logic (Q3305655) (← links)
- (Q3313793) (← links)
- Modal and Temporal Argumentation Networks (Q3587249) (← links)
- Assumption-Based Argumentation for Selection and Composition of Services (Q3602953) (← links)
- Argumentation for Practical Reasoning: An Axiomatic Approach (Q4571138) (← links)
- Balancing Rationality and Utility in Logic-Based Argumentation with Classical Logic Sentences and Belief Contraction (Q4571144) (← links)
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks (Q4583317) (← links)
- (Q4585837) (← links)
- Improved answer-set programming encodings for abstract argumentation (Q4592988) (← links)
- Reasoning on the Web with Assumption-Based Argumentation (Q4647817) (← links)
- A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of <i>ASPIC</i><sup>+</sup> and <i>DeLP</i> (Q4957198) (← links)
- (Q5020973) (← links)
- (Q5039144) (← links)
- An argumentative approach for handling inconsistency in prioritized Datalog ± ontologies (Q5054970) (← links)
- What Is a Reasonable Argumentation Semantics? (Q5172623) (← links)
- A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness (Q6066787) (← links)
- Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison (Q6097772) (← links)
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses (Q6116529) (← links)
- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation (Q6136108) (← links)
- The Jiminy advisor: moral agreements among stakeholders based on norms and argumentation (Q6488793) (← links)
- Reasoning in assumption-based argumentation using tree-decompositions (Q6545531) (← links)
- An awareness epistemic framework for belief, argumentation and their dynamics (Q6642567) (← links)