Intertwining operator realization of the AdS/CFT correspondence

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 01:23, 1 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:1572206

DOI10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00284-9zbMATH Open0958.81122arXivhep-th/9812194MaRDI QIDQ1572206

Author name not available (Why is that?)

Publication date: 12 July 2000

Published in: (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We give a group-theoretic interpretation of the AdS/CFT correspondence as relation of representation equivalence between representations of the conformal group describing the bulk AdS fields phi and the coupled boundary fields phi0 and calO. We use two kinds of equivalences. The first kind is equivalence between bulk fields and boundary fields and is established here. The second kind is the equivalence between coupled boundary fields. Operators realizing the first kind of equivalence for special cases were given by Witten and others - here they are constructed in a more general setting from the requirement that they are intertwining operators. The intertwining operators realizing the second kind of equivalence are provided by the standard conformal two-point functions. Using both equivalences we find that the bulk field has in fact two boundary fields, namely, the coupled boundary fields. Thus, from the viewpoint of the bulk-boundary correspondence the coupled fields are on an equal footing. Our setting is more general since our bulk fields are described by representations of the Euclidean conformal group G=SO(d+1,1), induced from representations au of the maximal compact subgroup SO(d+1) of G. From these large reducible representations we can single out representations which are equivalent to conformal boundary representations labelled by the conformal weight and by arbitrary representations mu of the Euclidean Lorentz group M=SO(d), such that mu is contained in the restriction of au to M. Thus, our boundary-to-bulk operators can be compared with those in the literature only when for a fixed mu we consider a 'minimal' representation au=au(mu) containing mu.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9812194




No records found.








This page was built for publication: Intertwining operator realization of the AdS/CFT correspondence

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1572206)