Infeasibility and error bound imply finite convergence of alternating projections

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 08:59, 10 July 2024 by Import240710060729 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240710060729)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:6346707

DOI10.1137/20M1358669arXiv2008.03354MaRDI QIDQ6346707

Author name not available (Why is that?)

Publication date: 7 August 2020

Abstract: This paper combines two ingredients in order to get a rather surprising result on one of the most studied, elegant and powerful tools for solving convex feasibility problems, the method of alternating projections (MAP). Going back to names such as Kaczmarz and von Neumann, MAP has the ability to track a pair of points realizing minimum distance between two given closed convex sets. Unfortunately, MAP may suffer from arbitrarily slow convergence, and sublinear rates are essentially only surpassed in the presence of some Lipschitzian error bound, which is our first ingredient. The second one is a seemingly unfavorable and unexpected condition, namely, infeasibility. For two non-intersecting closed convex sets satisfying an error bound, we establish finite convergence of MAP. In particular, MAP converges in finitely many steps when applied to a polyhedron and a hyperplane in the case in which they have empty intersection. Moreover, the farther the target sets lie from each other, the fewer are the iterations needed by MAP for finding a best approximation pair. Insightful examples and further theoretical and algorithmic discussions accompany our results, including the investigation of finite termination of other projection methods.





No records found.








This page was built for publication: Infeasibility and error bound imply finite convergence of alternating projections

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6346707)