Unfitted finite element methods using bulk meshes for surface partial differential equations (Q2927849)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Unfitted finite element methods using bulk meshes for surface partial differential equations |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6365796
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Unfitted finite element methods using bulk meshes for surface partial differential equations |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6365796 |
Statements
4 November 2014
0 references
elliptic and parabolic surface equations
0 references
unfitted finite elements
0 references
cut cells
0 references
error analysis
0 references
narrow band
0 references
sharp interface
0 references
bulk finite element
0 references
advection-diffusion conservation law
0 references
numerical result
0 references
Unfitted finite element methods using bulk meshes for surface partial differential equations (English)
0 references
The authors consider the finite element approximation of surface partial differential equations. They define new unfitted finite element methods for numerically approximating the exact solution using bulk finite elements. The key idea is that the \(n\)-dimensional hypersurface, \(\Gamma \subset \mathbb{R}^{n+1}\), is embedded in a polyhedral domain in \(\mathbb R^{n+1}\), consisting of a union, \(\mathcal{T}_h\), of \((n+1)\)-simplices. The unifying feature of the methodological approach is that the finite element approximating space is based on continuous piecewise linear finite element functions on the bulk triangulation \(\mathcal{T}_h\) which is independent of \(\Gamma\). The first method is a sharp interface method (\textit{SIF}) which uses the bulk finite element space in an approximating weak formulation obtained from integration on a polygonal approximation, \(\Gamma_{h}\), of \(\Gamma\). The full gradient is used rather than the projected tangential gradient and it is this which distinguishes \textit{SIF} from some previous methods. The second method is a narrow band method (\textit{NBM}) in which the region of integration is a narrow band of width \(O(h)\). \textit{NBM} is similar to the method of \textit{K. Deckelnick} et al. [IMA J. Numer. Anal. 30, No. 2, 351--376 (2010; Zbl 1191.65151)], but again, the full gradient is used in the discrete weak formulation. An a priori error analysis is presented and it shows that the methods are of optimal order in the surface \(L^{2}\) and \(H^{1}\) norms. The third method combines bulk finite elements, discrete sharp interfaces, and narrow bands in order to give an unfitted finite element method for parabolic equations on evolving surfaces. It is shown that the method is conservative so that it preserves mass in the case of an advection-diffusion conservation law. Some numerical results are presented to illustrate the rates of convergence.
0 references