On an invariant of link cobordism in dimension four (Q1060470)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 10:06, 15 July 2025 by CorrectionBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed label, description and/or aliases in en, and other parts)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3907387
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On an invariant of link cobordism in dimension four
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3907387

    Statements

    On an invariant of link cobordism in dimension four (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    It is not known in general whether a 2-dimensional link L (i.e., collection of disjoint imbedded 2-spheres in \(S^ 4)\) is slice (i.e., bounds disjoint 3-disks in \(D^ 5)\). A possible obstruction (in \({\mathbb{Z}}/2\) for a 2-component link) is the Sato-Levine invariant \(\beta\) defined by applying the Pontryagin construction to the intersection of Seifert ''surfaces'' for the individual components of L. This paper is devoted to showing \(\beta =0\) in many special cases. (In fact, it is a much more recent result of Kent Orr that \(\beta\) always vanishes.) The general technique used in the present paper is to reinterpret \(\beta\) as the bordism class of the spin manifold X, obtained by surgering \(S^ 4\) along L, and natural map \(X\to S^ 1\times S^ 1\). Among the conditions which are shown to imply \(\beta =0\) are: (1) one component of L is unknotted, (2) the group \(\pi\) of L maps into another group P which has the same low-dimensional \({\mathbb{Z}}/2\)-homology as the free group of rank 2. This latter case includes boundary links, which we know to be slice.
    0 references
    Seifert surfaces
    0 references
    slice link
    0 references
    2-dimensional link
    0 references
    Sato-Levine invariant
    0 references
    boundary links
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers