Pages that link to "Item:Q1290232"
From MaRDI portal
The following pages link to Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: Comparison to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach (Q1290232):
Displaying 13 items.
- Experimental methods and elicitation of values (Q702151) (← links)
- Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning (Q1267630) (← links)
- Combining intended demand and yes/no responses in the estimation of contingent valuation models (Q1267689) (← links)
- Inducing incentives to understate and to overstate willingness to pay within the open-ended and the dichotomous-choice elicitation formats: An experimetnal study (Q1268483) (← links)
- Effects of total cost and group-size information on willingness to pay responses: Open ended vs. dichotomous choice (Q1268500) (← links)
- Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty: a comment (Q1780820) (← links)
- Comparing three approaches that generate bids for the referendum contingent valuation method (Q1815778) (← links)
- Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation (Q2386164) (← links)
- Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness (Q2427708) (← links)
- Valuing publicly sponsored research projects: risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention (Q2461597) (← links)
- Discrete choice survey experiments: A comparison using flexible methods (Q2477732) (← links)
- A general model of starting point bias in double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation surveys (Q2569451) (← links)
- Strength-of-preference indicators and an ordered-response model for ordinarily dichotomous, discrete choice data (Q5938208) (← links)
