Pages that link to "Item:Q1869617"
From MaRDI portal
The following pages link to Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks (Q1869617):
Displaying 48 items.
- Argumentation update in YALLA (yet another logic language for argumentation) (Q289011) (← links)
- Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems (Q433517) (← links)
- Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats (Q465598) (← links)
- Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories (Q524939) (← links)
- Some syntactic approaches to the handling of inconsistent knowledge bases: A comparative study. I: The flat case (Q677077) (← links)
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks (Q766045) (← links)
- A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: Formalization and logical properties (Q835125) (← links)
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions (Q835816) (← links)
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks (Q835836) (← links)
- Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks (Q901144) (← links)
- An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases (Q997053) (← links)
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms (Q1028909) (← links)
- On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems (Q1028950) (← links)
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments (Q1601892) (← links)
- Logic-based argumentation with existential rules (Q1678415) (← links)
- Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities (Q1693566) (← links)
- Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation (Q1928824) (← links)
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics (Q2060740) (← links)
- Ensuring reference independence and cautious monotony in abstract argumentation (Q2069060) (← links)
- Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees (Q2130020) (← links)
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications (Q2237149) (← links)
- t-DeLP: an argumentation-based temporal defeasible logic programming framework (Q2248517) (← links)
- Formalizing argumentative reasoning in a possibilistic logic programming setting with fuzzy unification (Q2270426) (← links)
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values (Q2270427) (← links)
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency (Q2294581) (← links)
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks (Q2353975) (← links)
- Probabilistic argumentation (Q2390652) (← links)
- An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning (Q2409094) (← links)
- Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter (Q2409095) (← links)
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics (Q2457654) (← links)
- The burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation (Q2695517) (← links)
- Integrating individual preferences into collective argumentation (Q2695521) (← links)
- A Relaxation of Internal Conflict and Defence in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks (Q2835867) (← links)
- Translating preferred subtheories into structured argumentation (Q2937694) (← links)
- Arguing with Valued Preference Relations (Q3011935) (← links)
- Argumentation Theory and Decision Aiding (Q3058464) (← links)
- Handling controversial arguments (Q3400791) (← links)
- On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments (Q3524934) (← links)
- Towards an Extensible Argumentation System (Q3524937) (← links)
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks (Q3537543) (← links)
- Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks (Q4583317) (← links)
- Preference-Based Inconsistency Assessment in Multi-Context Systems (Q4930761) (← links)
- A Persuasion Dialog for Gaining Access to Information (Q5385615) (← links)
- Preferences and Assumption-Based Argumentation for Conflict-Free Normative Agents (Q5385618) (← links)
- Arguing and Explaining Classifications (Q5385620) (← links)
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses (Q6116529) (← links)
- Change in quantitative bipolar argumentation: sufficient, necessary, and counterfactual explanations (Q6570290) (← links)
- Determining preferences over extensions: a cautious approach to preference-based argumentation frameworks (Q6587910) (← links)