The following pages link to Condorcet’s Paradox (Q5483165):
Displaying 39 items.
- Book review of: G. G. Szpiro, Numbers rule. The vexing mathematics of democracy, from Plato to the present (Q384423) (← links)
- Are Condorcet procedures so bad according to the reinforcement axiom? (Q404755) (← links)
- Voting with rubber bands, weights, and strings (Q449038) (← links)
- The impact of voters' preference diversity on the probability of some electoral outcomes (Q459405) (← links)
- Generalized Condorcet winners (Q483530) (← links)
- Triple-acyclicity in majorities based on difference in support (Q528705) (← links)
- Borda's paradox with weighted scoring rules (Q656803) (← links)
- The likelihood of single-peaked preferences under classic and new probability distribution assumptions (Q826624) (← links)
- On the probability of observing Borda's paradox (Q976964) (← links)
- Voces populi and the art of listening (Q989981) (← links)
- On the stability of a triplet of scoring rules (Q993505) (← links)
- The unexpected behavior of plurality rule (Q1036103) (← links)
- Asymptotic vulnerability of positional voting rules to coalitional manipulation (Q1680740) (← links)
- The likelihood of a Condorcet winner in the logrolling setting (Q1697837) (← links)
- On the likelihood of single-peaked preferences (Q1704048) (← links)
- Monotonicity paradoxes in three-candidate elections using scoring elimination rules (Q1707108) (← links)
- The reinforcement axiom under sequential positional rules (Q1959697) (← links)
- Frequency based analysis of collective aggregation rules (Q1985731) (← links)
- Structured preferences: a literature survey (Q2096158) (← links)
- An analysis of random elections with large numbers of voters (Q2127897) (← links)
- How frequently do different voting rules encounter voting paradoxes in three-candidate elections? (Q2247941) (← links)
- The Borda rule and the pairwise-majority-loser revisited (Q2281446) (← links)
- Probabilities of electoral outcomes: from three-candidate to four-candidate elections (Q2300612) (← links)
- An interactive approach to determine the elements of a pairwise comparison matrix (Q2418168) (← links)
- Developing the aggregate empirical side of computational social choice (Q2436696) (← links)
- Simple manipulation-resistant voting systems designed to elect Condorcet candidates and suitable for large-scale public elections (Q2452140) (← links)
- What shall we do with the cyclic profile? (Q2452147) (← links)
- Probability calculations under the IAC hypothesis (Q2463576) (← links)
- A comparison of theoretical and empirical evaluations of the Borda compromise (Q2513291) (← links)
- Should voters be required to rank candidates in an election? (Q2629520) (← links)
- Intransitivity and meta-intransitivity: meta-dice, levers and other opportunities (Q2699566) (← links)
- Extremal Restriction, Condorcet Sets, and Majority Decision Making (Q2787397) (← links)
- A Geometric Approach to Paradoxes of Majority Voting: From Anscombe’s Paradox to the Discursive Dilemma with Saari and Nurmi (Q4644770) (← links)
- Probabilistic view of voting, paradoxes, and manipulation (Q5081545) (← links)
- Similarity Suppresses Cyclicity: Why Similar Competitors Form Hierarchies (Q6086808) (← links)
- Beyond the worst case: semi-random complexity analysis of winner determination (Q6167260) (← links)
- When ties are possible: weak Condorcet winners and Arrovian rationality (Q6173748) (← links)
- A phase transition in Arrow's theorem with three alternatives (Q6616874) (← links)
- Probabilistic models of profiles for voting by evaluation (Q6624515) (← links)
