Pages that link to "Item:Q2353924"
From MaRDI portal
The following pages link to Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding (Q2353924):
Displaying 32 items.
- A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation (Q722102) (← links)
- Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic (Q899191) (← links)
- Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations (Q1711894) (← links)
- Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches (Q1726415) (← links)
- A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation (Q1748533) (← links)
- A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: definition, properties, and examples of application (Q1749391) (← links)
- Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation (Q1935594) (← links)
- Capturing bipolar argumentation in non-flat assumption-based argumentation (Q2092513) (← links)
- Advanced algorithms for abstract dialectical frameworks based on complexity analysis of subclasses and SAT solving (Q2124467) (← links)
- Generalizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworks (Q2146009) (← links)
- A probabilistic deontic argumentation framework (Q2206475) (← links)
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities (Q2238615) (← links)
- Delegated updates in epistemic graphs for opponent modelling (Q2302776) (← links)
- A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation (Q2302822) (← links)
- Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments (Q2303513) (← links)
- On three-valued acceptance conditions of abstract dialectical frameworks (Q2333663) (← links)
- Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks (Q2695518) (← links)
- Logical foundations for bipolar and tripolar argumentation networks: preliminary results (Q2804329) (← links)
- Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework (Q2835889) (← links)
- Probabilistic Abstract Dialectical Frameworks (Q2938525) (← links)
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks (Q3537543) (← links)
- Foundations for a logic of arguments (Q4586228) (← links)
- Labeled Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (Q4989339) (← links)
- On searching explanatory argumentation graphs (Q4995618) (← links)
- On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach (Q5140009) (← links)
- Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs (Q5915677) (← links)
- Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks (Q6133708) (← links)
- A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics (Q6545533) (← links)
- A propositional logical encoding of enriched interactions in abstract argumentation graphs (Q6599625) (← links)
- Evidence-based argumentation and its incremental semantics (Q6622382) (← links)
- How to manage supports in incomplete argumentation (Q6630206) (← links)
- Collective argumentation: the case of aggregating support-relations of bipolar argumentation frameworks (Q6642568) (← links)