Pages that link to "Item:Q2388821"
From MaRDI portal
The following pages link to The strong no show paradoxes are a common flaw in Condorcet voting correspondences (Q2388821):
Displaying 24 items.
- Condorcet's principle and the strong no-show paradoxes (Q490062) (← links)
- Extensions of the Young and Levenglick result about the inconsistency of Condorcet voting correspondences (Q554496) (← links)
- An extension of the Moulin no show paradox for voting correspondences (Q836920) (← links)
- Another potential shortcoming of AHP (Q874884) (← links)
- Set-monotonicity implies Kelly-strategyproofness (Q904832) (← links)
- On the practical possibility of a 'no show paradox' under the single transferable vote (Q1069835) (← links)
- Concorcet's principle implies the no show paradox (Q1106064) (← links)
- To vote or not to vote: What is the quota? (Q1114569) (← links)
- Revisiting the connection between the no-show paradox and monotonicity (Q1680090) (← links)
- Optimal bounds for the no-show paradox via SAT solving (Q1680092) (← links)
- Topological aggregation, the twin paradox and the No Show paradox (Q1704047) (← links)
- Welfare maximization entices participation (Q1735819) (← links)
- The stability set as a social choice correspondence. (Q1867836) (← links)
- A theoretical examination of the ranked choice voting procedure (Q2151318) (← links)
- Condorcet consistency and the strong no show paradoxes (Q2334862) (← links)
- A strong paradox of multiple elections (Q2386270) (← links)
- Monotonicity properties and their adaptation to irresolute social choice rules (Q2450081) (← links)
- What shall we do with the cyclic profile? (Q2452147) (← links)
- (Q3384086) (← links)
- Exploring the No-Show Paradox for Condorcet Extensions (Q5053695) (← links)
- (Q5258672) (← links)
- An impossibility theorem concerning positive involvement in voting (Q6498749) (← links)
- Building bridges over the great divide (Q6637494) (← links)
- Measuring violations of positive involvement in voting (Q6642575) (← links)
