Pages that link to "Item:Q2437268"

The following pages link to On biases in assessing replicability, statistical consistency and publication bias (Q2437268):

Displaying 10 items.

• A Bound for Publication Bias Based on the Fraction of Unpublished Studies (Q73247) (← links)
• \(p_{\text{rep}}\): an agony in five fits (Q734670) (← links)
• Improving the conduct and reporting of statistical analysis in psychology. Response to the comments ``Thinking about data, research methods, and statistical analyses'' and ``Encourage playing with data and discourage questionable reporting practices'' pro (Q736425) (← links)
• How redefining statistical significance can worsen the replication crisis (Q2311145) (← links)
• Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias (Q2437263) (← links)
• It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013) (Q2437267) (← links)
• The consistency test does not -- and cannot -- deliver what is advertised: a comment on Francis (2013) (Q2437269) (← links)
• Clarifications on the application and interpretation of the test for excess significance and its extensions (Q2437270) (← links)
• We should focus on the biases that matter: a reply to commentaries (Q2437272) (← links)
• Using Journal Impact Factors to Correct for the Publication Bias of Medical Studies (Q3436525) (← links)