The following pages link to Paradoxes of Preferential Voting (Q3670859):
Displaying 50 items.
- Varieties of failure of monotonicity and participation under five voting methods (Q365799) (← links)
- Voting with rubber bands, weights, and strings (Q449038) (← links)
- Condorcet's principle and the strong no-show paradoxes (Q490062) (← links)
- One-way monotonicity as a form of strategy-proofness (Q532698) (← links)
- Some remarks on the concept of proportionality (Q744682) (← links)
- Consistency of decision processes (Q751938) (← links)
- The Borda dictionary (Q808973) (← links)
- An extension of the Moulin no show paradox for voting correspondences (Q836920) (← links)
- Set-monotonicity implies Kelly-strategyproofness (Q904832) (← links)
- Ensuring a representative referendum outcome: the daunting task of setting the quorum right (Q964825) (← links)
- Research in decision theory: A personal perspective (Q1056649) (← links)
- Concorcet's principle implies the no show paradox (Q1106064) (← links)
- Symmetry, voting, and social choice (Q1110424) (← links)
- To vote or not to vote: What is the quota? (Q1114569) (← links)
- The likelihood of monotonicity paradoxes in run-off elections (Q1278562) (← links)
- A voluntary participation game with a non-excludable public good (Q1289261) (← links)
- Monotonicity of single-seat preferential election rules (Q1364784) (← links)
- Revisiting the connection between the no-show paradox and monotonicity (Q1680090) (← links)
- Optimal bounds for the no-show paradox via SAT solving (Q1680092) (← links)
- Topological aggregation, the twin paradox and the No Show paradox (Q1704047) (← links)
- Monotonicity paradoxes in three-candidate elections using scoring elimination rules (Q1707108) (← links)
- Welfare maximization entices participation (Q1735819) (← links)
- The geometry of Black's single peakedness and related conditions (Q1966226) (← links)
- Characterizing referenda with quorums via strategy-proofness (Q2015028) (← links)
- Complexity of shift bribery for iterative voting rules (Q2095550) (← links)
- The Italian referendum: what can we get from game theory? (Q2095940) (← links)
- Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best? (Q2125101) (← links)
- A theoretical examination of the ranked choice voting procedure (Q2151318) (← links)
- Quota rules for incomplete judgments (Q2203496) (← links)
- How frequently do different voting rules encounter voting paradoxes in three-candidate elections? (Q2247941) (← links)
- New variable-population paradoxes for resource allocation (Q2247950) (← links)
- Condorcet consistency and the strong no show paradoxes (Q2334862) (← links)
- Complexity and the geometry of voting (Q2389766) (← links)
- Judgement and ranking: living with hidden bias (Q2399332) (← links)
- Interacting double monotonicity failure with direction of impact under five voting methods (Q2446694) (← links)
- Monotonicity properties and their adaptation to irresolute social choice rules (Q2450081) (← links)
- Simple manipulation-resistant voting systems designed to elect Condorcet candidates and suitable for large-scale public elections (Q2452140) (← links)
- What shall we do with the cyclic profile? (Q2452147) (← links)
- From Black’s Advice and Arrow’s Theorem to the Gibbard–Satterthewaite Result (Q2787393) (← links)
- Discrete Mathematics in Voting and Group Choice (Q3321780) (← links)
- (Q3384086) (← links)
- Electing to Disagree (Q4962099) (← links)
- Exploring the No-Show Paradox for Condorcet Extensions (Q5053695) (← links)
- A Game of Nontransitive Dice (Q5108606) (← links)
- Inferring Sparse Preference Lists from Partial Information (Q5141707) (← links)
- Constrained dictatorial rules are subject to variable-population paradoxes (Q6611991) (← links)
- Monotonicity anomalies in Scottish local government elections (Q6624500) (← links)
- Building bridges over the great divide (Q6637494) (← links)
- Strategic voting and strategic candidacy (Q6637499) (← links)
- Measuring violations of positive involvement in voting (Q6642575) (← links)
