Pages that link to "Item:Q719049"

The following pages link to Condorcet vs. Borda in light of a dual majoritarian approach (Q719049):

Displaying 16 items.

• Is majority consistency possible? (Q258932) (← links)
• Finding the threshold of exclusion for all single seat and multi-seat scoring rules: illustrated by results for the Borda and Dowdall rules (Q505282) (← links)
• The costs of implementing the majority principle: The golden voting rule (Q868423) (← links)
• The Borda and Condorcet principles: Three medieval applications (Q909550) (← links)
• The Borda method is most likely to respect the Condorcet principle (Q1339031) (← links)
• The Borda rule, Condorcet consistency and Condorcet stability (Q1411103) (← links)
• Scoring rules cannot respect majority in choice and elimination simultaneously (Q1867805) (← links)
• Pairwise consensus and the Borda rule (Q2127889) (← links)
• Characterising scoring rules by their solution in iteratively undominated strategies (Q2168539) (← links)
• Daunou's voting rule and the lexicographic assignment of priorities (Q2244420) (← links)
• The Borda rule and the pairwise-majority-loser revisited (Q2281446) (← links)
• Borda and the maximum likelihood approach to vote aggregation (Q2473067) (← links)
• Why the Count de Borda cannot beat the Marquis de Condorcet (Q2500711) (← links)
• A comparison of theoretical and empirical evaluations of the Borda compromise (Q2513291) (← links)
• (Q3491276) (← links)
• Condorcet meets Ellsberg (Q4586056) (← links)