Subpullback flat \(S\)-posets need not be subequalizer flat. (Q1014775)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Subpullback flat \(S\)-posets need not be subequalizer flat. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5549500
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Subpullback flat \(S\)-posets need not be subequalizer flat. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5549500 |
Statements
Subpullback flat \(S\)-posets need not be subequalizer flat. (English)
0 references
29 April 2009
0 references
A right \(S\)-poset \(A_S\) is called `subpullback flat' (resp. `subequalizer flat') if the functor \(A_S\otimes-\) preserves subpullbacks (resp. subequalizers). It is proved that if \(S\) is a non-trivial, commutative, cancellative pomonoid in which 1 is the greatest element, then the one-element \(S\)-poset \(\Theta_S\) is subpullback flat but is not subequalizer flat. A new proof of the fact that a pullback flat \(S\)-act is equalizer flat is presented as well.
0 references
ordered monoids
0 references
\(S\)-posets
0 references
flatness
0 references
po-acts
0 references
categories of acts
0 references
pullbacks
0 references
equalizers
0 references
partially ordered acts
0 references