Three theories of nominalized predicates (Q1073011)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Three theories of nominalized predicates |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3943782
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Three theories of nominalized predicates |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3943782 |
Statements
Three theories of nominalized predicates (English)
0 references
1985
0 references
This paper surveys some formal systems which can be used to model nominalization in natural language. (I.e., the process which turns predicates ('love', 'divine') into individual concepts for these ('to love', 'divinity').) The challenge is to do this while avoiding conflicts of cardinality between the sets of individuals and predicates - and at the same time, maintaining as strong Comprehension principles as possible. First, a Fregean logic with Quinean stratification is considered (due to Cocchiarella), then a three-valued Aczel-Feferman type-free logic, and finally - the author's favourite - a classical version of the latter in the Feferman-Gillmore format. It is shown that the latter has models by a domain construction similar to Scott's modelling of the type-free lambda calculus.
0 references
stratified formula
0 references
Scott domain
0 references
nominalization
0 references
Comprehension
0 references
Fregean logic with Quinean stratification
0 references
three-valued Aczel-Feferman type-free logic
0 references
Feferman-Gillmore format
0 references