Do we need models ? (Q1097875)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Do we need models ? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4035804
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Do we need models ? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4035804 |
Statements
Do we need models ? (English)
0 references
1987
0 references
Ordinary model-theoretic semantics assigns objects to individual symbols as their denotations (n-tuples of objects to n-ary predicates, etc.). In truth valuational semantics, truth values are assigned to atomic formulas directly, and not via an assignment of denotations to their constituent expressions. It may be thought that such a semantics would have difficulty with \(\omega\)-inconsistent sets. The authors develop a non- denotational semantics (it is not quite truth valuational in the old sense) which has exactly the power of classical model-theoretic semantics, suggesting that models (and other denotative notions) are semantically unnecessary.
0 references
model theory
0 references
truth valuational semantics
0 references
\(\omega \)-inconsistent sets
0 references
non-denotational semantics
0 references