Some remarks concerning an example of a minimal, non-uniquely ergodic interval exchange transformation (Q1099279)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Some remarks concerning an example of a minimal, non-uniquely ergodic interval exchange transformation |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4040221
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Some remarks concerning an example of a minimal, non-uniquely ergodic interval exchange transformation |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4040221 |
Statements
Some remarks concerning an example of a minimal, non-uniquely ergodic interval exchange transformation (English)
0 references
1988
0 references
This note is a further discussion of the class of examples constructed in a paper by \textit{H. B. Keynes} and \textit{D. Newton} [Math. Z. 148, 101-105 (1976; Zbl 0308.28014)]. A gap in their argumentation is pointed out and then filled. In order to accomplish this correction, the following result is proven. If \(\gamma\) \(\in (0,1)\) has unbounded partial quotients, let \(T_{\gamma}x=x+\gamma (mod 1).\) If \(\beta\) \(\in (0,1)\), let \(f_{\beta}(x)=\chi _{[0,\beta)}(x)-\chi _{[\beta,1)}(x).\) Then \(\gamma\), \(\beta\) can be chosen so that the equation \(g(T_{\gamma}x)=f_{\beta}(x)g(x)\) has a solution. This result relies heavily upon \textit{W. A. Veech} [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 140, 1-33 (1969; Zbl 0201.056)].
0 references
non-uniquely ergodic interval exchange transformation
0 references
unbounded partial quotients
0 references
0.90995824
0 references
0.8924567
0 references
0 references
0.87115103
0 references
0.86849403
0 references
0.86807233
0 references
0.8665397
0 references
0.86628574
0 references