Sequence comparison with concave weighting functions (Q1101364)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4047483
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Sequence comparison with concave weighting functions
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4047483

    Statements

    Sequence comparison with concave weighting functions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    We consider efficient methods for computing a difference metric between two sequences of symbols, where the cost of an operation to insert or delete a block of symbols is a concave function of the block's length. Alternatively, sequences can be optimally aligned when gap penalties are a concave function of the gap length. Two algorithms based on the `candidate list paradigm' first used by \textit{M. S. Waterman} [J. theor. Biol. 108, 333-337 (1984)] are presented. The first computes significantly more parsimonious candidate lists than Waterman's method. The second method refines the first to the point of guaranteeing \(O(N^ 2lg N)\) worst-case time complexity, and under certain conditions \(O(N^ 2).\) Experimental data show how various properties of the comparison problem affect the methods' relative performance. A number of extensions are discussed, among them a technique for constructing optimal alignments in O(N) space in expectation. This variation gives a practical method for comparing long amino sequences on a small computer.
    0 references
    biochemistry
    0 references
    WSB algorithm
    0 references
    sequence comparison
    0 references
    difference metric
    0 references
    concave function
    0 references
    algorithms
    0 references
    candidate list paradigm
    0 references
    constructing optimal alignments
    0 references
    comparing long amino sequences
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references