The importance of open and recursive circumscription (Q1117210)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: The importance of open and recursive circumscription |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4091468
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | The importance of open and recursive circumscription |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4091468 |
Statements
The importance of open and recursive circumscription (English)
0 references
1989
0 references
The problems of inconsistency, incompleteness etc. of circumscription are considered. \textit{P. L. Mott} [Artif. Intell. 31, 87-98 (1987; Zbl 0624.68082)] proposed two restrictions of standad circumscription, called closed and non-recursive circumscription. Mott's propositions are criticized here. In particular, closed circumscription used very unnaturally binding of free variables in substitutional frameworks. According to the authors, Mott's restrictions are too hard. The arguments for open and recursive circumscription \((=\) standard) are given.
0 references
consistency
0 references
soundness
0 references
completeness
0 references
circumscription
0 references
0.7825188636779785
0 references
0.7811538577079773
0 references
0.7758840322494507
0 references
0.7746421694755554
0 references