\(R\)-generability, and definability in branching time logics (Q1197983)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: \(R\)-generability, and definability in branching time logics |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 92064
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | \(R\)-generability, and definability in branching time logics |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 92064 |
Statements
\(R\)-generability, and definability in branching time logics (English)
0 references
16 January 1993
0 references
We study the power of branching time temporal logics such as \(\text{CTL}^*\) to define properties of computation paths related to the condition of \(R\)-generability introduced by Emerson. This condition ensures that neither past behaviour, nor fairness or scheduling criteria are necessary to determine the admissible computations, and it is thus of some practical significance. As shown by Emerson \(R\)-generability can be analysed in terms of the conditions of suffix, fusion, and limit closure. In general \(R\)-generability and the three closure conditions are undefinable. However, a slightly more refined analysis reveals that relativised definability results are in fact possible. The main results are summarised as follows: 1. Limit closure in undefinable, even when relativised to frames that are both fusion and suffix closed. 2. Fusion closure is definable for frames that are both limit and suffix closed. 3. Suffix closure is definable for frames that are either limit or fusion closed. Moreover, the conditions in both (2) and (3) are necessary.
0 references
computation theory
0 references
branching time temporal logics
0 references
\(\text{CTL}^*\)
0 references
computation paths
0 references
\(R\)-generability
0 references
definability
0 references