Buffon, Price, and Laplace: Scientific attribution in the 18th century (Q1203003)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Buffon, Price, and Laplace: Scientific attribution in the 18th century |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 110349
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Buffon, Price, and Laplace: Scientific attribution in the 18th century |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 110349 |
Statements
Buffon, Price, and Laplace: Scientific attribution in the 18th century (English)
0 references
9 February 1993
0 references
The history of the rule of succession of \textit{Laplace} (1812) is being traced back to \textit{David Hume}'s Treatise of 1739. \textit{Laplace} criticized the solution, which \textit{G.-L. L. Buffon} gave in his Essai d'arithmétique morale (1777). The famous work of \textit{Th. Bayes} (1764), or better the covering letter to this paper by \textit{Richard Price} is the source of \textit{Buffon}'s answer. \textit{J. W. F. Herschel} (1857) was one of the few to understand the distinction involved. \textit{M.-J.-A.-N. Marquis de Condorcet} attempted the first mathematical analysis of the problem, but used a formula only appropriate to \textit{Laplace}'s example. His attempt led to further confusions. \textit{Laplace} gave a correct analysis and he drew the proper conclusions, but he failed to mention his predecessors. 24 references.
0 references
rule of succession
0 references
David Hume
0 references
G.-L. L. Buffon
0 references
Th. Bayes
0 references
R. Price
0 references
Marquis de Condorcet
0 references
P. S. de Laplace
0 references
0.7983437180519104
0 references
0.7983437180519104
0 references
0.7418218851089478
0 references