Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Buffon, Price, and Laplace: Scientific attribution in the 18th century - MaRDI portal

Deprecated: Use of MediaWiki\Skin\SkinTemplate::injectLegacyMenusIntoPersonalTools was deprecated in Please make sure Skin option menus contains `user-menu` (and possibly `notifications`, `user-interface-preferences`, `user-page`) 1.46. [Called from MediaWiki\Skin\SkinTemplate::getPortletsTemplateData in /var/www/html/w/includes/Skin/SkinTemplate.php at line 691] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372

Deprecated: Use of QuickTemplate::(get/html/text/haveData) with parameter `personal_urls` was deprecated in MediaWiki Use content_navigation instead. [Called from MediaWiki\Skin\QuickTemplate::get in /var/www/html/w/includes/Skin/QuickTemplate.php at line 131] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372

Buffon, Price, and Laplace: Scientific attribution in the 18th century (Q1203003)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 110349
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Buffon, Price, and Laplace: Scientific attribution in the 18th century
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 110349

    Statements

    Buffon, Price, and Laplace: Scientific attribution in the 18th century (English)
    0 references
    9 February 1993
    0 references
    The history of the rule of succession of \textit{Laplace} (1812) is being traced back to \textit{David Hume}'s Treatise of 1739. \textit{Laplace} criticized the solution, which \textit{G.-L. L. Buffon} gave in his Essai d'arithmétique morale (1777). The famous work of \textit{Th. Bayes} (1764), or better the covering letter to this paper by \textit{Richard Price} is the source of \textit{Buffon}'s answer. \textit{J. W. F. Herschel} (1857) was one of the few to understand the distinction involved. \textit{M.-J.-A.-N. Marquis de Condorcet} attempted the first mathematical analysis of the problem, but used a formula only appropriate to \textit{Laplace}'s example. His attempt led to further confusions. \textit{Laplace} gave a correct analysis and he drew the proper conclusions, but he failed to mention his predecessors. 24 references.
    0 references
    rule of succession
    0 references
    David Hume
    0 references
    G.-L. L. Buffon
    0 references
    Th. Bayes
    0 references
    R. Price
    0 references
    Marquis de Condorcet
    0 references
    P. S. de Laplace
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references