Note on a question by S. Bagchi and B. Bagchi (Q1203953)
From MaRDI portal
 | This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Note on a question by S. Bagchi and B. Bagchi |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 123870
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Note on a question by S. Bagchi and B. Bagchi |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 123870 |
Statements
Note on a question by S. Bagchi and B. Bagchi (English)
0 references
18 February 1993
0 references
In [J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 52, No. 1, 51-61 (1989; Zbl 0679.05008)] \textit{S. Bagchi} and \textit{B. Bagchi} conjectured that one of the hypotheses of their theorem \(2(d)\) is superfluous. This turns out to be true.
0 references
cyclic design
0 references
unitals
0 references
Steiner \(t\)-design
0 references
automorphism group
0 references
