Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Value distribution of meromorphic functions satisfying generalised second Painlevé differential equation - MaRDI portal

Value distribution of meromorphic functions satisfying generalised second Painlevé differential equation (Q1282002)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1269662
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Value distribution of meromorphic functions satisfying generalised second Painlevé differential equation
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1269662

    Statements

    Value distribution of meromorphic functions satisfying generalised second Painlevé differential equation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    17 August 1999
    0 references
    This article is devoted to considering the differential equation \(f^{(2m)}=Kf^3+zf+C\), where \(m\geq 1\) is an integer, and \(K\) and \(C\) are complex constants. This equation may be understood as a generalized second Painlevé equation. It is easy to see that for any meromorphic solution \(f\), all poles of \(f\) are of multiplicity \(m\) and the deficiency \(\delta(a,f)=0\) for every \(a\in\mathbb{C}\). Moreover, counting a-points of \(f\) of multiplicity \(\geq s\) only, and applying for the integrated counting function \(N_s(r,a,f)\) of such a-points the reduced multiplicity \(\nu(a,z)-s\) instead of the multiplicity \(\nu(a,z)\), the following results will be proved: \[ \theta_1(\infty,f)= \liminf_{r\to\infty} {N_1(r,f) \over T(r,f)}= {m-1\over m},\quad \theta_m (a,f)=\liminf_{r\to\infty} {N_m(r,f) \over T(r,f)} \leq{m\over 2m+1}. \] Moreover, \[ \liminf_{r\to\infty} {N\left(r, {1\over f'} \right)\over T(r,f)}={m+1 \over m},\quad \liminf_{r\to \infty} {N\left(r, {1\over f'}\right) +2N(r,f)- N(r,f')\over T(r,f)}=2. \] The proofs apply the standard Nevalinna theory. Some confusion appears in the notations.
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers