On an eighth order formula for solving a Schrödinger equation (Q1282392)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On an eighth order formula for solving a Schrödinger equation |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1271980
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On an eighth order formula for solving a Schrödinger equation |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1271980 |
Statements
On an eighth order formula for solving a Schrödinger equation (English)
0 references
30 May 1999
0 references
The goal of the note is to compare the classical fourth order Numerov method with another more recent eighth order method introduced by \textit{A. C. Allison, A. D. Raptis} and \textit{T. E. Simos} [J. Comput. Phys. 97, No. 1, 240-248 (1991; Zbl 0753.65064)] for the equation \[ d^2y(r)/dr^2+(c_6r^{-6}-c_{12}r^{-12}+k^2)y(r)=0 \] with boundary conditions \[ y(0)=0,\qquad y(r)\to A(\sin kr+\tan \delta \cos kr) \text{ as } r\to \infty, \] where \(c_6\), \(c_{12}\), \(k\), \(A\), \(\delta\) are constants. It is concluded that caution is needed when applying any finite difference method to solve a differential equation with singularities. As might be expected, the numerical tests show that the eighth order formula is more accurate than Numerov's method, but also that the Allison's formula is flattered by the above mentioned equation example (proposed also in Allison's paper) because the wave function grows significantly just when the local truncation error decreases acceptably.
0 references
boundary value problems
0 references
second order linear ordinary differential equations
0 references
Numerov's method
0 references
Schrödinger equation
0 references
finite difference method
0 references
eighth order formula
0 references
wave function
0 references
0 references