Determination of risky and safe boundaries of the stability region of discrete systems (Q1324049)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Determination of risky and safe boundaries of the stability region of discrete systems |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 584243
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Determination of risky and safe boundaries of the stability region of discrete systems |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 584243 |
Statements
Determination of risky and safe boundaries of the stability region of discrete systems (English)
0 references
24 July 1994
0 references
This paper deals with the problem of determining the risky and safe boundaries of the equilibrium stability region for discrete systems given by \[ \overline {x}_ j= \sum_{l=1}^ n a_{jl} x_ l+ F_ j (x_ 1, x_ 2, \dots, x_ n), \qquad j=1,2, \dots, n, \tag{1} \] where \(n\geq 2\) and \(a_{jl}\) are real coefficients, \(F_ j (x_ 1, x_ 2, \dots, x_ n)\) are analytical or sufficiently smooth functions, assuming that \(A= [a_{jl} ]_{n\times n}\) and the characteristic equation \(\Delta (\lambda)= | A-\lambda I|=0\) has roots \(\lambda_{1,2}= \exp(\pm i\varphi)\), \(0< \varphi< \pi\), \(\varphi\neq \pi/2\), \(2\pi/3\), and the remaining roots \(\lambda_ k\) satisfy \(| \lambda_ k |<1\). For the discrete systems (1), the paper proposes a constant similar to the Lyapunov values for differential equations as follows: \[ g_ 1= \begin{cases}\text{Re } \lambda_ 2 \biggl[ A_{112}+ {{2(2 \lambda_ 1-1)} \over {\lambda_ 1 (1- \lambda_ 1)}} A_{11} A_{12} \biggr] -2 | A_{12} |^ 2- | A_{22}|^ 2, \;n=2\\ \text{Re } \lambda_ 2 \biggl[ A_{112}+ {{4A_{113} A_{312}} \over {1- \lambda_ 3}} + {{4\lambda_{123} A_{311}}\over {\lambda_ 1^ 2- \lambda_ 3}} + {{2(2 \lambda_ 1-1)} \over {\lambda_ 1 (1- \lambda_ 1)}} A_{111} A_{112} \biggr] - 2| A_{12} |^ 2- | A_{22} |^ 2, \;n=3\\ \text{Re } \lambda_ 2 \sum_{j=1}^ n \Delta_{j1} (\lambda_ 1) \{ \sum_{1\leq k\leq l\leq n} a_{jkl} (\sigma_{l1} \gamma_{11}^{(k)}+ \sigma_{k1} \gamma_{11}^{(l)}+ \sigma_{k2} \gamma_{20}^{(l)}+ \sigma_{l2} \gamma_{20}^{(k)})+\\ \sum_{1\leq k\leq l\leq n}a_{jkls} [\sigma_{k1} \sigma_{l1}\sigma_{s2}+ \sigma_{21}(\sigma_{k1} \sigma_{2l}+\sigma_{k2} \sigma_{l1})]\}/ \sum_{k=1}^ n\Delta_{1k} (\lambda_ 1)\Delta_{k1} (\lambda_ 1),\;n>3 \end{cases} \tag{2} \] where all the coefficients \(A_{kl}\), \(A_{kls}\) and \(A_{jkls}\) are expressed in terms of \(a_{jl}\), and \(\sigma_{kl}\) in terms of both \(a_{jl}\) and \(\lambda_ k\). Then the conclusion on the boundaries of the stability regions of (1) is that \(\bullet\) The boundaries are safe, if \(g_ 1<0\); \(\bullet\) The boundaries are risky, if \(g_ 1>0\).
0 references
safe boundaries
0 references
stability region
0 references
discrete systems
0 references
0.86817324
0 references
0.86720014
0 references
0.8627963
0 references
0.86223114
0 references