Lack of compactness in conformal metrics with \(L^{d/2}\) curvature (Q1329630)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Lack of compactness in conformal metrics with \(L^{d/2}\) curvature |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 605082
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Lack of compactness in conformal metrics with \(L^{d/2}\) curvature |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 605082 |
Statements
Lack of compactness in conformal metrics with \(L^{d/2}\) curvature (English)
0 references
9 April 1995
0 references
The second author [Compactness of conformal metrics with integral bounds on curvature, Preprint, 1991], extending results of \textit{S.-Y. A. Chang} and \textit{P. C. P. Yang} [J. Am. Math. Soc. 3, No. 1, 117-145 (1990; Zbl 0701.58056)] and \textit{B. Osgood, R. Phillips} and \textit{P. Sarnak} [J. Funct. Anal. 80, No. 1, 212-234 (1988; Zbl 0653.53021)], proved that when \(d \geq 4\) the metrics on a \(d\)-dimensional compact manifold in a fixed conformal class satisfying a uniform \(L^{(d/2) + \varepsilon}\) bound on curvature and a bound on volume are compact in a \(C^ \alpha\)-topology. One can ask whether metrics on a \(d\)-dimensional compact manifold in a fixed conformal class satisfying a uniform \(L^{(d/2)}\) bound on curvature and a bound on volume are compact in the \(C^ 0\) topology. The authors show that this is always false. Thus the curvature assumption of recent compactness results for conformal metrics is sharp.
0 references
curvature bound
0 references
conformal class
0 references
compactness results
0 references
0.90614593
0 references
0.89531416
0 references
0.89487606
0 references
0.88432616
0 references
0.88419867
0 references
0.88397133
0 references
0.8821432
0 references
0.87559414
0 references