Existence domains for holomorphic \(L^ p\) functions (Q1344473)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Existence domains for holomorphic \(L^ p\) functions |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 722045
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Existence domains for holomorphic \(L^ p\) functions |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 722045 |
Statements
Existence domains for holomorphic \(L^ p\) functions (English)
0 references
13 February 1995
0 references
The author announces the following theorem. Let \(\Omega \Subset U \subset \mathbb{C}^ n\) be domains of holomorphy such that \((U, \Omega)\) is a Runge pair. Then \(\Omega\) is an existence domain for holomorphic \(L^ p\) functions with arbitrary \(p \in (0, + \infty)\). The proof proposed by the author is wrong. The main mistake is on page 210 when the author claims that for any \(v \in \mathbb{N}\) there exists \(k_ v \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \[ \int_ \Omega \left( \sum_{m = 1}^ v \biggl | \bigl[ f_ m(z) \bigr]^{v_ m} \biggr | \right)^ pd \lambda (z) \leq \left( {2k_{v-1} \over k_ v} \right)^ p. \] This is evidently impossible. The reviewer does not know whether the theorem is true.
0 references
domains of holomorphy
0 references
Runge pair
0 references