Why Legendre made a wrong guess about \(\pi(x)\), and how Laguerre's continued fraction for the logarithmic integral improved it. (Q1411668)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1998264
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Why Legendre made a wrong guess about \(\pi(x)\), and how Laguerre's continued fraction for the logarithmic integral improved it.
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1998264

    Statements

    Why Legendre made a wrong guess about \(\pi(x)\), and how Laguerre's continued fraction for the logarithmic integral improved it. (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    16 December 2003
    0 references
    This gives an historical account of attempts to approximate \(\pi(x)\). Laguerre's continued fraction for \(li(x)\) shows that convergence to \(\pi(x)\sim x/(\ln x- 1)\) is very slow and Legendre had available calculations of \(\pi(x)\) only for \(x\) up to \(4.10^5\). Tables are given showing the discrepancies between approximations to \(\pi(x)\) by various methods and for various values of \(x\) up to \(10^{22}\). (The largest value of \(x\) for which \(\pi(x)\) is currently known is \(4.10^{22}\)).
    0 references
    0 references
    approximatoins to \(\pi(x)\)
    0 references

    Identifiers