Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Redshift and contact forms - MaRDI portal

Redshift and contact forms (Q1685874)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Redshift and contact forms
scientific article

    Statements

    Redshift and contact forms (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    20 December 2017
    0 references
    In this note the authors prove that over a globally hyperbolic Lorentzian manifold the photon redshift factor in general relativity arises as the ratio of two appropriate Penrose-Low contact structures on the corresponding space of null curves. More precisely, let \((X,\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle)\) be a connected time-oriented Lorentzian manifold with \(\dim X\geqq 2\) and consider two infinitesimal observers in \(X\), i.e., two future-pointing unit timelike vectors \(n_E\) and \(n_R\) at the events \(E, R\in X\) connected by a null geodesic \(\gamma\). Then the \textit{photon redshift} \(z=z(n_E,n_R,\gamma)\in{\mathbb R}\) from \(n_E\) (``emitter'') to \(n_R\) (``receiver'') along \(\gamma\) is defined by \[ 1+z:=\frac{\langle n_E,\dot{\gamma}(E)\rangle}{\langle n_R,\dot{\gamma}(R)\rangle}. \] Assume that \((X,\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle)\) is moreover globally hyperbolic and pick one Cauchy surface \(M\subset X\). Consider the set \({\mathfrak N}_X\) of future-directed inextendible null geodesics along \(X\) up to orientation-preserving reparametrisations. For every \(M\) this space can be endowed with a contact structure as follows. There is an obvious embedding \(i_M:{\mathfrak N}_X\rightarrow T^*M\) via \(\gamma\mapsto \langle \dot{\gamma} (x),\cdot\rangle|_M/\langle \dot{\gamma} (x),n_M(x)\rangle\) where \(x =\gamma\cap M\) is the unique intersection point and \(n_M\) is the future-pointing unit normal vector field along \(M\). Then a \textit{contact structure} \(\alpha_M\) on \({\mathfrak N}_X\) is defined via \(\alpha_M:=i^*_M(\lambda_{\mathrm{can}})\) where \(\lambda_{\mathrm{can}}\) is the canonical contact form on \(T^*M\) (locally given by \(\sum_kq^k\mathrm{d}p^k\)). The main result of the article is that for two Cauchy surfaces \(M,M'\subset X\), the equality \[ \frac{\alpha_{M'}(v)}{\alpha_M(v)}= 1+z(n_M(x),n_{M'}(x'),\gamma ) \] holds with any tangent vector \(v\) at \(\gamma\in {\mathfrak N}_X\) (see Theorem 1.2 and its proof in Section 2). This result is then applied to make a comparison between the Liouville volume forms on the contact manifolds \(({\mathfrak N}_X, \alpha_M)\) and the Riemannian volume forms along \((X,\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle)|_M\) (see Section 3 in the article).
    0 references
    redshift
    0 references
    globally hyperbolic spacetime
    0 references
    space of light rays
    0 references
    contact structure
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers