Multiattribute group decision making with unknown decision expert weights information in the framework of interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (Q1718810)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Multiattribute group decision making with unknown decision expert weights information in the framework of interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7016906
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Multiattribute group decision making with unknown decision expert weights information in the framework of interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7016906 |
Statements
Multiattribute group decision making with unknown decision expert weights information in the framework of interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (English)
0 references
8 February 2019
0 references
Summary: The aim of this paper is to investigate an approach to multiattribute group decision making with interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, in which the decision expert weights are unknown. First, we introduce a distance measure between two interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy matrixes, and based on the distance between individual matrix and extreme matrix, as well as the average matrix, we obtain the decision expert weights. Second, we utilize the interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy weighted geometric (IITFWG) operator and the interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy ordered weighted geometric (IITFOWG) operator to aggregate all individual interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy decision matrices into a collective interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy decision matrix and then derive the group overall evaluation values of the given alternatives. Finally, an illustrative example of emergency alternatives selection is given to demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method.
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0.93125135
0 references
0.9166995
0 references
0.9080787
0 references
0.89528245
0 references
0.8917809
0 references