A counterexample to Zarrin's conjecture on sizes of finite nonabelian simple groups in relation to involution sizes (Q1729717)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: A counterexample to Zarrin's conjecture on sizes of finite nonabelian simple groups in relation to involution sizes |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7030935
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A counterexample to Zarrin's conjecture on sizes of finite nonabelian simple groups in relation to involution sizes |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7030935 |
Statements
A counterexample to Zarrin's conjecture on sizes of finite nonabelian simple groups in relation to involution sizes (English)
0 references
28 February 2019
0 references
\textit{M. Zarrin} produced in [Arch. Math. 111, No. 4, 349--351 (2018; Zbl 1425.20017)] a counterexample to a conjecture of \textit{M. Herzog} [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 77, 313--314 (1979; Zbl 0421.20009)] that two finite simple groups having the same number of involutions must have the same order. Zarrin went on and conjectured in turn that two finite simple groups having the same number of involutions and also the same number of elements of an odd prime order \(p\) must have the same order. The author of this short note provides an example showing that even Zarrin's conjecture [loc. cit.] is false.
0 references
finite simple groups
0 references
nonabelian
0 references
involution
0 references
element order
0 references