Some results on extensionality in lambda calculus (Q1765154)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Some results on extensionality in lambda calculus |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2137205
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Some results on extensionality in lambda calculus |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2137205 |
Statements
Some results on extensionality in lambda calculus (English)
0 references
23 February 2005
0 references
A counterexample of Plotkin showed that the \(\lambda\)-theory with the \((\omega)\) rule: \[ \text{If }MQ=NQ\text{ for all closed terms }Q\text{ then }M=N, \] is not recursively enumerable. It is also well known that \(\lambda \beta \eta\), which is recursively enumerable, does not satisfy \((\omega)\). This paper answers a question of Cantini by showing that there is a recursively enumerable \(\lambda\)-theory which satisfies \((\omega)\). The work leads to a better understanding of Plotkin's counterexample.
0 references
Plotkin's counterexample
0 references
lambda-theory
0 references
omega-rule
0 references
recursive enumerability
0 references
extensionality
0 references