A counterexample concerning uniform ergodic theorems for a class of functions (Q1897079)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: A counterexample concerning uniform ergodic theorems for a class of functions |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 796377
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A counterexample concerning uniform ergodic theorems for a class of functions |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 796377 |
Statements
A counterexample concerning uniform ergodic theorems for a class of functions (English)
0 references
26 March 1996
0 references
It is proved that \textit{V. N. Vapnik}'s and \textit{A. Ya. Chervonenkis}' [Theory Probab. Appl. 16, 264-280 (1971); translation from Teor. Veroyatn. Primen. 16, 264-279 (1971; Zbl 0247.60005)] and \textit{M. Talagrand}'s [Ann. Probab. 15, 837-870 (1987; Zbl 0632.60024)] conditions do not imply convergence of relative frequencies to the probability \(P(C)\) for every set \(C \in {\mathcal L} \subset {\mathcal F}\) if one replaces the sequence of independent random variables with values in measurable space \(({\mathcal X}, {\mathcal F})\) by an ergodic stationary random process defined on \(({\mathcal X}, {\mathcal F})\) with marginal distribution \(P\).
0 references
Glivenko-Cantelli class
0 references
Vapnik-Chervonenkis class
0 references
stationary ergodic processes
0 references
0 references
0 references