Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Corrections and additions for ``The moon-test in Newton's principia: Accuracy of inverse-square law of universal gravitation'' - MaRDI portal

Corrections and additions for ``The moon-test in Newton's principia: Accuracy of inverse-square law of universal gravitation'' (Q1913677)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 881717
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Corrections and additions for ``The moon-test in Newton's principia: Accuracy of inverse-square law of universal gravitation''
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 881717

    Statements

    Corrections and additions for ``The moon-test in Newton's principia: Accuracy of inverse-square law of universal gravitation'' (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    27 May 1996
    0 references
    [This concerns the article in Arch. Hist. Exact. Sci. 44, No. 2, 147-190 (1992; Zbl 0763.01008).] In Huygens' Horologium Oscillatorium (1673) there is a statement that the distance of fall is 15 feet 1 inch (Paris) without giving more digits. The author discusses why Newton did not content with this accuracy. One conceivable reason is that Newton wanted to defend himself and to strengthen his standpoint against the criticism by Leibniz, who maintained that universal gravitation is not explainable or is a scholastic occult quality. The author comes to the conclusion that 15 feet 1 inch, the final value Huygens gave as the distance of fall, is reasonable, but that Newton's adopted value in the third edition of the Principia is given to an unreasonable number of significant figures.
    0 references
    universal gravitation
    0 references

    Identifiers