Hereditary crossed product orders over discrete valuation rings. (Q1952143)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Hereditary crossed product orders over discrete valuation rings. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6166662
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Hereditary crossed product orders over discrete valuation rings. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6166662 |
Statements
Hereditary crossed product orders over discrete valuation rings. (English)
0 references
27 May 2013
0 references
Weak crossed products, given by 2-cocycles with non-invertible values, have been considered in 1982 by D. E. Haile. For a tamely ramified extension \(S|R\) of discrete valuation domains with Galois group \(G\), and a cocycle \(f\colon G\times G\to S\setminus 0\), the associated crossed product order \(A_f=\sum_{\sigma\in G}Sx_\sigma\) need not be hereditary. The so-called inertial subgroup \(H\) of \(G\) consists of the \(\sigma\in G\) with \(f(\sigma,\sigma^{-1})\in S^\times\). One can form the crossed product \(B_f=\sum_{\sigma\in H}Sx_\sigma\). The author proves first that the radical of \(A_f\) is given by \(\pi_SB_f\oplus\sum_{\sigma\notin H}Sx_\sigma\). Then he provides equivalent conditions for \(A_f\) to be hereditary. One of his characterizations states that the \(f(\sigma,\sigma^{-1})\) are ``almost invertible'': they do not belong to the squared radical of \(S\).
0 references
crossed products
0 references
hereditary orders
0 references
weak crossed product orders
0 references
ramification
0 references
weak Galois cohomology
0 references
weak cocycles
0 references