Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Covering \(n\)-permutations with \((n+1)\)-permutations - MaRDI portal

Covering \(n\)-permutations with \((n+1)\)-permutations (Q1953379)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Covering \(n\)-permutations with \((n+1)\)-permutations
scientific article

    Statements

    Covering \(n\)-permutations with \((n+1)\)-permutations (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    7 June 2013
    0 references
    Summary: Let \(S_n\) be the set of all permutations on \([n]:=\{1,2,\ldots,n\}\). We denote by \(\kappa_n\) the smallest cardinality of a subset \({\mathcal A}\) of \(S_{n+1}\) that ``covers'' \(S_n\), in the sense that each \(\pi\in S_n\) may be found as an order-isomorphic subsequence of some \(\pi'\) in \({\mathcal A}\). What are general upper bounds on \(\kappa_n\)? If we randomly select \(\nu_n\) elements of \(S_{n+1}\), when does the probability that they cover \(S_n\) transition from 0 to 1? Can we provide a fine-magnification analysis that provides the ``probability of coverage'' when \(\nu_n\) is around the level given by the phase transition? In this paper we answer these questions and raise others.
    0 references
    probability of coverage
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references