One counterexample for two open questions about the rings \(R(X)\) and \(R\langle X\rangle\) (Q1969363)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: One counterexample for two open questions about the rings \(R(X)\) and \(R\langle X\rangle\) |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1416175
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | One counterexample for two open questions about the rings \(R(X)\) and \(R\langle X\rangle\) |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1416175 |
Statements
One counterexample for two open questions about the rings \(R(X)\) and \(R\langle X\rangle\) (English)
0 references
29 June 2000
0 references
Recall that a domain \(R\) is strong \(S\) (resp., catenarian) if, for each consecutive pair \(q\subset q\) of primes in \(R\), the extended primes \(p[X] \subset q[X]\) are consecutive in \(R[X]\) (resp., \(\text{ht}(q)= \text{ht}(p)+1)\). The author constructs a commutative domain \(R\) such that \(R(X)\) is catenarian, but \(R\langle X \rangle\) is not a strong \(S\)-ring. Actually, the construction is done with \(X\) replaced by any finite number of indeterminates.
0 references
catenarian polynomial ring
0 references
monic polynomials
0 references
Nagata ring
0 references
strong \(S\)-ring
0 references