Sharp bounds for the maximum of the Goodman-Kruskal \(\tau\) index (Q1979099)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Sharp bounds for the maximum of the Goodman-Kruskal \(\tau\) index |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1452445
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Sharp bounds for the maximum of the Goodman-Kruskal \(\tau\) index |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1452445 |
Statements
Sharp bounds for the maximum of the Goodman-Kruskal \(\tau\) index (English)
0 references
24 May 2000
0 references
In many situations one variable (say, \(Y\)) is a response variable and the other one (\(Z\)) an explanatory variable, and it is of interest to analyze the dependency of \(Y\) upon \(Z.\) To this aim, \textit{N. Lauro} and \textit{L. D'Ambra} [E. Diday et al. (eds.), Data Analysis and Informatics III, 433-446 (1984)] developed the so called ``non symmetrical correspondence analysis'', a factorial analysis whose aim is to visualize the dependence of \(Y\) on \(Z\) on factorial planes. In this situation, one important index measuring the strength of the dependency of \(Y\) on \(Z,\) namely the Goodman and Kruskal's \(\tau_{Y/Z}\) index, plays a great role. For given marginals, \(\tau\) seldom reaches its theoretical upper bound, \(1.\) It seems therefore reasonable to determine the maximum value the index can assume in a class of contingency tables with given marginals. Three kinds of heuristics developed to this aim are presented in this paper. An upper bound for the maximum is determined so that it is possible to estimate the relative error of the proposed heuristics.
0 references
contingency tables
0 references
Frechet classes
0 references
Goodman and Kruskal's tau
0 references
minimax approach
0 references
non symmetrical correspondence analysis
0 references
quadratic programming
0 references
0.8551632
0 references
0.8481692
0 references
0.84687436
0 references
0.84626013
0 references
0.84483683
0 references
0.84292537
0 references
0.8425002
0 references