Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Comparison of three different parallel computation methods for a two-dimensional dam-break model - MaRDI portal

Deprecated: Use of MediaWiki\Skin\SkinTemplate::injectLegacyMenusIntoPersonalTools was deprecated in Please make sure Skin option menus contains `user-menu` (and possibly `notifications`, `user-interface-preferences`, `user-page`) 1.46. [Called from MediaWiki\Skin\SkinTemplate::getPortletsTemplateData in /var/www/html/w/includes/Skin/SkinTemplate.php at line 691] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372

Deprecated: Use of QuickTemplate::(get/html/text/haveData) with parameter `personal_urls` was deprecated in MediaWiki Use content_navigation instead. [Called from MediaWiki\Skin\QuickTemplate::get in /var/www/html/w/includes/Skin/QuickTemplate.php at line 131] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372

Comparison of three different parallel computation methods for a two-dimensional dam-break model (Q1992450)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6971823
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Comparison of three different parallel computation methods for a two-dimensional dam-break model
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6971823

    Statements

    Comparison of three different parallel computation methods for a two-dimensional dam-break model (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 November 2018
    0 references
    Summary: Three parallel methods (OpenMP, MPI, and OpenACC) are evaluated for the computation of a two-dimensional dam-break model using the explicit finite volume method. A dam-break event in the Pangtoupao flood storage area in China is selected as a case study to demonstrate the key technologies for implementing parallel computation. The subsequent acceleration of the methods is also evaluated. The simulation results show that the OpenMP and MPI parallel methods achieve a speedup factor of 9.8{\( \times \)} and 5.1{\( \times \)}, respectively, on a 32-core computer, whereas the OpenACC parallel method achieves a speedup factor of 20.7{\( \times \)} on NVIDIA Tesla K20c graphics card. The results show that if the memory required by the dam-break simulation does not exceed the memory capacity of a single computer, the OpenMP parallel method is a good choice. Moreover, if GPU acceleration is used, the acceleration of the OpenACC parallel method is the best. Finally, the MPI parallel method is suitable for a model that requires little data exchange and large-scale calculation. This study compares the efficiency and methodology of accelerating algorithms for a dam-break model and can also be used as a reference for selecting the best acceleration method for a similar hydrodynamic model.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references