Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
A mathematical investigation of Rao diversity coefficients among the communities according to species morphometry and species taxonomy - MaRDI portal

A mathematical investigation of Rao diversity coefficients among the communities according to species morphometry and species taxonomy (Q2204617)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A mathematical investigation of Rao diversity coefficients among the communities according to species morphometry and species taxonomy
scientific article

    Statements

    A mathematical investigation of Rao diversity coefficients among the communities according to species morphometry and species taxonomy (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    15 October 2020
    0 references
    Summary: Although Rao diversity coefficient (Rao DIVC) is sensitive to the differences among species, a gap still remains in investigating how the communities are affected when the dissimilarity among the species are in terms of its morphometry and taxonomy. I studied the effect of using species taxonomic classification and species morphometrical traits in the computation of Rao DIVC in assessing diversity of ecological communities. I utlised the Mahalanobis distance for measuring the variation of species morphometry. As for species taxonomy, I employed the method by \textit{R. M. Warwick} and \textit{K. R. Clarke} [``New `biodiversity' measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress'', Marine Ecol. Prog. Ser. 129, 301--305 (1995; \url{doi:10.3354/meps129301})]. When the calculated Rao DIVCs, double principal coordinate analysis and co-inertia analysis outputs were compared, I discovered that Rao DIVCs accounting species morphometry (\(R_{sm}\)) and species taxonomy (\(R_{st}\)) yielded different results and interpretation. \(R_{sm}\) clearly showed more the variation among communities but contributed less in the analysis, whereas \(R_{st}\) showed more clearly the clusters between the communities which make the interpretation easier.
    0 references
    double principal coordinate analysis
    0 references
    DPCoA
    0 references
    Mahalanobis distance
    0 references
    Rao diversity coefficient
    0 references
    Rao DIVC
    0 references
    co-inertia analysis
    0 references
    COIA
    0 references

    Identifiers