On the equivariant formality of Kähler manifolds with torus group actions (Q2384748)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the equivariant formality of Kähler manifolds with torus group actions
scientific article

    Statements

    On the equivariant formality of Kähler manifolds with torus group actions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    10 October 2007
    0 references
    An algebraic model for a space is a commutative differential graded algebra (CDGA) that determines the rational homotopy type of the space. A space is called formal if its rational homotopy type is determined by its cohomology ring regarded as a CGDA with differential \(d=0\). A classical theorem of rational homotopy theory states that compact Kähler manifolds are formal [\textit{P. Deligne, P. Griffiths, J. Morgan} and \textit{D. Sullivan}, Invent. Math. 29, 245--274 (1975; Zbl 0312.55011)]. In this paper the author applies her previous work on equivariant rational homotopy theory to prove an equivariant version of this theorem for compact simply connected Kähler manifolds with a holomorphic action of a torus group \(\mathbb{T}\). The author starts by reviewing the algebraic model \(\underline{\varOmega}(X)\) introduced in [\textit{M. A. Mandell} and \textit{L. Scull}, Math. Z. 240, No.~2, 261--287 (2002; Zbl 1005.55003)], for a \(\mathbb{T}\)-space \(X\). Here \(\underline{\varOmega}(X)\) is a diagram of CGDA indexed on a category \(\mathcal{D}\) related to the orbit category of \(\mathbb{T}\). This model uses a version of the de Rham differential form functor applied to the Borel bundles of the fixed sets \(X^K\), \(K < \mathbb{T}\). Then, for a Kähler manifold \(M\), an alternate model \(\underline{\mathbf{A}}^{\bullet}_{\mathbb{T}}(M\)) is introduced using forms on \(M\) rather than forms on Borel spaces. Using this model, the proof of formality for compact Kähler manifolds in [\textit{P. Deligne, P. Griffiths, J. Morgan} and \textit{D. Sullivan}, op. cit.] is adapted to the equivariant setting. In the last section, two examples coming from linear actions of \(\mathbb{T}^1\) on complex projective spaces are presented in detail.
    0 references
    equivariant homotopy
    0 references
    rational homotopy
    0 references
    formality
    0 references

    Identifiers