On keen weakly reducible Heegaard splittings (Q2411460)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On keen weakly reducible Heegaard splittings
scientific article

    Statements

    On keen weakly reducible Heegaard splittings (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    24 October 2017
    0 references
    Critical surfaces and topologically minimal surfaces were introduced by \textit{D. Bachman} [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 354, No. 10, 4015--4042 (2002; Zbl 1003.57023); Geom. Topol. 14, No. 1, 585--609 (2010; Zbl 1206.57020)], respectively. They are very useful in the theory of Heegaard splittings of \(3\)-manifolds. For example, \textit{D. Bachman} proved Gordon's Conjecture in [Geom. Topol. 12, No. 4, 2327--2378 (2008; Zbl 1152.57020)] by using critical Heegaard surfaces. By the definition of critical surface, if the Heegaard surface of a Heegaard splitting is critical, then the Heegaard splitting is weakly reducible. By the definition of topological index of a surface \(F\), \(F\) has topological index \(0\) if and only if it is incompressible, and has topological index \(1\) if and only if it is strongly irreducible. \textit{A. Ido, Y. Jang} and \textit{T. Kobayashi} defined keen Heegaard splittings of \(3\)-manifolds in [``On keen Heegaard splittings'', Preprint, \url{arXiv:1605.04513}] and showed that for any integers \(n\geq 2\) and \(g\geq 3\), there exists a strongly keen Heegaard splitting of genus \(g\) whose distance is \(n\). In the paper under review, the author considers keen weakly reducible Heegaard surfaces and whether a keen weakly reducible Heegaard surface is critical or topologically minimal as follows: Theorem 3.1. For each \(g>2\), there are infinitely many genus \(g\), keen, weakly reducible Heegaard splittings of closed \(3\)-manifolds. Corollary 4.1. Suppose that a \(3\)-manifold \(M\) admits an amalgamated Heegaard splitting: \(M=V\cup_{S} W=(V_{1}\cup_{S_{1}} W_{1})\cup_{F}(V_{2}\cup_{S_{2}} W_{2})\), such that \(g(F)=g(S_{1})=g(S_{2})\) and \(d(S_{i})\geq 4\) for \(i=1, 2\), then \(V\cup_{S} W\) is keen weakly reducible and \(S\) is not topologically minimal. Corollary 4.2. Suppose that a \(3\)-manifold \(M\) admits an amalgamated Heegaard splitting: \(M=V\cup_{S} W=(V_{1}\cup_{S_{1}} W_{1})\cup_{F}(V_{2}\cup_{S_{2}} W_{2})\), such that \(g(F)=g(S_{1})=g(S_{2})\) and \(d(S_{i})\geq 2\) for \(i=1, 2\), then \(S\) is either critical or not topologically minimal.
    0 references
    0 references
    3-manifolds
    0 references
    Heegaard surfaces
    0 references
    keen weakly reducible
    0 references
    topologically minimal surfaces
    0 references

    Identifiers