Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Flexing closed hyperbolic manifolds. - MaRDI portal

Flexing closed hyperbolic manifolds. (Q2464446)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Flexing closed hyperbolic manifolds.
scientific article

    Statements

    Flexing closed hyperbolic manifolds. (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    20 December 2007
    0 references
    As remarked in [\textit{R. E. Schwartz}, Ann. Math. (2) 153, No. 3, 533--598 (2001; Zbl 1055.20040)], it is a basic problem to understand how discrete faithful representations \(\rho:\Gamma\to G_0\) can be deformed if one extends the Lie group \(G_0\) to a larger group \(G_1\). The best understood example of this is the case of quasi-Fuchsian deformation, where \(\Gamma\) is the fundamental group of a closed orientable surface and the Lie groups are \(G_0= \text{PSL}(2,\mathbb{R})\) and \(G_1= \text{PSL}(2,\mathbb{C})\). By considering the Klein model one sees that a hyperbolic structure is in particular a projective structure. The authors investigate the following question: Can the hyperbolic structure on a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold be deformed to a nontrivial real projective structure? Their first result is that with a mild smoothness hypothesis, the existence of such real projective deformations is in some sense equivalent to the existence of a deformation of the representation into the isometry group of complex hyperbolic space. More precisely, they prove the following result: assume that \(\rho: \pi_1(M)\to \text{SO}_0(n,1)\) is a representation of a closed hyperbolic \(n\)-manifold \(M\) which is a smooth point of the representation variety \(V= \Hom(\pi_1(M), \text{PGL}(n+ 1,\mathbb{R}))\). Then \(\rho\) is a smooth point of \(\Hom(\pi_1(M), PU(n, 1))\), and \[ \dim_{\mathbb{R}}(\Hom(\pi_1(M), PU(n, 1)))= \dim_{{\mathbb{R}}}\Hom(\pi_1(M), \text{PGL}(n+ 1,\mathbb{R})) \] near \(\rho\). Moreover, it turns out that if the original representation is the discrete faithful representation, then sufficiently close to \(\rho\) in \(\Hom(\pi_1(M), PU(n,1))\), the deformed representations are also discrete and faithful. Some examples complete this fine paper.
    0 references
    real projective structure
    0 references
    complex isometry
    0 references
    flexing
    0 references

    Identifiers