Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
A path to the Arrow-Debreu competitive market equilibrium - MaRDI portal

A path to the Arrow-Debreu competitive market equilibrium (Q2467155)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A path to the Arrow-Debreu competitive market equilibrium
scientific article

    Statements

    A path to the Arrow-Debreu competitive market equilibrium (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    21 January 2008
    0 references
    The author presents polynomial time algorithms for computing the Fisher and Arrow-Debreu competitive marked equilibrium. A formulation of Fisher's model as convex program leads to optimality conditions which can be solved similar to the primal-dual interior point algorithm for LP's. The complexity of the algorithm is of order \( O(n^4 \log{1/\varepsilon})\) for an \(\varepsilon\)-approximation and of \( O(n^4 L)\) for an exact solution of the problem (with rational data). Secondly, an interior point algorithm for solving the Arrow-Debreu equilibrium problem is presented with complexity \( O(n^4 \log{1/\varepsilon})\) for an \(\varepsilon\)-approximation and \( O(n^4 L)\) for an exact solution as well. This algorithm is based on a convex programming formulation of Arrow-Debreu's model combined with a logarithmic transformation. This formulation allows an interior point approach with selfconcordant barrier function. Finally a formulation of Arrow-Debreu's model as convex program combined with a fixed point condition leads to optimality conditions which can be solved by an interior point pathfollowing procedure. A complexity result for this approach is not yet obtained. The complexity bounds for the algorithms in this article are much better compared with bounds for previously discussed algorithms.
    0 references
    Fisher and Arrow-Debreu competitive market models
    0 references
    convex program
    0 references
    interior point methods
    0 references
    complexity
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers