Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
An auditory-masking-threshold-based noise suppression algorithm GMMSE-AMT[ERB] for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss - MaRDI portal

An auditory-masking-threshold-based noise suppression algorithm GMMSE-AMT[ERB] for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (Q2502757)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
An auditory-masking-threshold-based noise suppression algorithm GMMSE-AMT[ERB] for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss
scientific article

    Statements

    An auditory-masking-threshold-based noise suppression algorithm GMMSE-AMT[ERB] for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 September 2006
    0 references
    Summary: This study describes a new noise suppression scheme for hearing aid applications based on the auditory masking threshold (AMT) in conjunction with a modified generalized minimum mean square error estimator (GMMSE) for individual subjects with hearing loss. The representation of cochlear frequency resolution is achieved in terms of auditory filter equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs). Estimation of AMT and spreading functions for masking are implemented in two ways: with normal auditory thresholds and normal auditory filter bandwidths (GMMSE-AMT[ERB]-NH) and with elevated thresholds and broader auditory filters characteristic of cochlear hearing loss (GMMSE-AMT[ERB]-HI). Evaluation is performed using speech corpora with objective quality measures (segmental SNR, Itakura-Saito), along with formal listener evaluations of speech quality rating and intelligibility. While no measurable changes in intelligibility occurred, evaluations showed quality improvement with both algorithm implementations. However, the customized formulation based on individual hearing losses was similar in performance to the formulation based on the normal auditory system.
    0 references
    normal hearing
    0 references
    hearing impaired
    0 references
    auditory masking threshold
    0 references
    equivalent rectangular bandwidth
    0 references
    generalized minimum mean square estimation
    0 references

    Identifiers