Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Explicit Brauer induction for symplectic and orthogonal representations. - MaRDI portal

Explicit Brauer induction for symplectic and orthogonal representations. (Q2575124)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Explicit Brauer induction for symplectic and orthogonal representations.
scientific article

    Statements

    Explicit Brauer induction for symplectic and orthogonal representations. (English)
    0 references
    5 December 2005
    0 references
    The classical Brauer Induction Theorem expresses a complex representation of a finite group as an integral linear combination of representations induced from one-dimensional representations of subgroups. This paper uses algebraic methods to give a uniform generalization of Brauer induction to unitary, orthogonal and symplectic representations. For \(n\in\mathbb{N}\), let \(X(n)\) denote either \(U(n)\) (unitary case), \(O(2n)\) (orthogonal case) or \(\text{Sp}(n)\) (symplectic case). Let \(G\) be a finite group and \(\rho\colon G\to X(n)\) a representation. Then \[ \rho=\sum_{(H,\Psi)<(H_1,\Psi_1)<\cdots<(H_r,\Psi_r)}(-1)^r\tfrac{|H|}{|G|} m(\text{Res}_{H_r}^G\rho,\Psi_r)\text{Ind}_H^G\Psi\tag{*} \] where the sum runs over all chains of pairs \((H_i,\Psi_i)\) of subgroups \(H_i\leq G\) and representations \(\Psi_i\colon H_i\to X(1)\) (this is missprinted as \(X(i)\) on p. 100 of the paper), subject to the compatibility conditions \(\Psi_i|H_{i-1}=\Psi_{i-1}\). To define the coefficients, let \(c\colon R^OG\to R^UG\) and \(c\colon R^{\text{Sp}}_+(G)\to R^UG\) denote the respective complexification maps from the Grothendieck rings \(R^OG\) and \(R^{\text{Sp}}_+(G)\) of orthogonal and symplectic representations to those of unitary representations. Then \[ m(\Theta,\Psi)=\left\{\begin{alignedat}{2}2&\;\langle\theta,\psi\rangle_H \hphantom{\langle\theta,\psi\rangle_H/\langle\psi,\psi\rangle_H}\quad\text{with }\psi=\Psi\quad &&\text{unitary case} \\ &\;\langle\theta,\psi\rangle_H/\langle \psi,\psi\rangle_H\hphantom{\langle \theta,\psi\rangle_H}\quad\text{with }\psi=c(\Psi)\quad &&\text{symplectic case} \\ &\left.\begin{alignedat}{2} &\langle\theta,\psi\rangle_H\qquad&&\text{with }c(\Psi)=\psi\text{ irr.}\qquad \\ &\langle\theta,\lambda\rangle_H\qquad&&\text{with }c(\Psi)=\lambda+\overline\lambda\qquad \\ &[\langle\theta,\phi\rangle_H/2]\qquad&&\text{with }c(\Psi)=2\phi\qquad \\ &1 &&\text{with }c(\Psi)=\phi+\phi'\text{ odd}\qquad \\ &0 &&\text{otherwise}\qquad\end{alignedat}\right\}\quad &&\text{orthogonal case}\end{alignedat}\right. \] The formula (*) is functorial, but, in general, the coefficients need not be integers. However, integrality is shown for representations of Galois groups of certain local number field extensions. In section 1 the authors explain the topological motivation for this research, namely a proof of the existence of an exponential stable decomposition of the classifying space \(B\text{Sp}\) of the symplectic group Sp. However, they point out that there is still some uncertainty about the existence of such a decomposition. Another motivation (section 5) comes from sympletic local root numbers. The lengthy proof of the induction formula is developed combinatorially from scratch, and several explicit examples are given to aid the reader.
    0 references
    explicit Brauer induction
    0 references
    symplectic representations
    0 references
    finite groups
    0 references
    integral linear combinations of representations
    0 references
    one-dimensional representations of subgroups
    0 references
    orthogonal representations
    0 references
    Grothendieck rings
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers