Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Transverse Lie jets and holomorphic geometric objects on transverse bundles - MaRDI portal

Transverse Lie jets and holomorphic geometric objects on transverse bundles (Q2629434)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Transverse Lie jets and holomorphic geometric objects on transverse bundles
scientific article

    Statements

    Transverse Lie jets and holomorphic geometric objects on transverse bundles (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    6 July 2016
    0 references
    Given a foliated manifold \((M,\mathcal{F})\) locally isomorphic to \(\mathbb{R}^n\times \mathbb{R}^m\) (with copies of \(\mathbb{R}^m\) being the leaves) and a Weil algebra \(\mathbb{A}\), one constructs a \textit{bundle of transverse \(\mathbb{A}\)-velocities} \(\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}M\) locally modeled on \(\mathbb{A}^n\oplus\mathbb{R}^m\). Roughly speaking to build \(\mathrm{T}^\mathbb{A}_{\mathrm{tr}}M\) we consider the full bundle of \(\mathbb{A}\)-velocities \(\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}} M\) on \(M\) and forget the parts of \(\mathbb{A}\)-velocities which are tangent to the leaves. \(\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}} M\) is naturally a bundle over \(M\) and an \(\mathbb{A}\)-manifold. It turns out that \(\mathbb{A}\)-automorphisms of this bundle (i.e., \(\mathbb{A}\)-diffeomorphisms which are bundle maps and leave the base invariant) are in 1-1 correspondence with sections \(\alpha:M\rightarrow\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}} M\). On \(M\) one considers a \textit{bundle of foliated \(r\)-frames} \(P^r_{\mathrm{fol}}M\), i.e., \(r\)-jets of germs of foliation isomorphisms \((\mathbb{R}^n\times\mathbb{R}^m,0)\rightarrow M\). This is naturally a \(G\)-bundle, with \(G\) being the group of \(r\)-jets of germs of foliation automorphisms \((\mathbb{R}^n\times\mathbb{R}^m,0)\rightarrow (\mathbb{R}^n\times\mathbb{R}^m,0)\). Given a \(G\)-space \(\beta:G\times F\rightarrow F\) one considers a \textit{field of geometric objects of type \((F,\beta)\) on \(M\)} understood as a \(G\)-equivariant map \(\lambda:P^r_{\mathrm{fol}}M\rightarrow F\). Additionally we want \(F\) to be \(G\)-fibrated over a \(G\)-space \(\overline{F}\). If \(\lambda\) projects to a \(G\)-equivariant map \(\overline{\lambda}:P^r_{\mathrm{tr}}M\rightarrow \overline{F}\) (here \(P^r_{\mathrm{tr}}M\) are foliated transverse \(r\)-frames on \(M\)), we call \(\lambda\) a \textit{field of transverse geometric objects of type \((F,\beta)\) on \(M\)}. By Theorem 1, every such a field \(\lambda\) can be naturally \(\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}\)-lifted to an \textit{\(\mathbb{A}\)-field of geometric objects of type \((\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}F,\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}\beta)\) on \(\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}} M\)}, i.e., a \(G^{\mathbb{A}}\)-equivariant map \(\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}\lambda:P^r(\mathbb{A})\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}M\rightarrow \mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}} F\). Here \(P^r(\mathbb{A})\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}M\) is a bundle of \(r\)-jets of germs of \(\mathbb{A}\)-diffeomorphisms \((\mathbb{A}^n\oplus\mathbb{R}^m,0)\rightarrow \mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}M\), being a \(G^{\mathbb{A}}\)-principal bundle, where \(G^{\mathbb{A}}\) is a group of \(r\)-jets of germs of \(\mathbb{A}\)-automorphisms \((\mathbb{A}^n\oplus\mathbb{R}^m,0)\rightarrow(\mathbb{A}^n\oplus\mathbb{R}^m,0)\). The authors use the (in my opinion misleading) term \textit{bundle of holomorphic \(r\)-frames on \(\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}M\)} to describe \(P^r(\mathbb{A})\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}M\). On the other hand, \(G^{\mathbb{A}}\)-equivariant maps \(\Lambda:P^r(\mathbb{A})\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}M\rightarrow \mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}} F\) can be considered on their own right. The main result of the paper is Theorem 2 which provides a characterization of these \(\mathbb{A}\)-fields \(\Lambda\) of geometric objects of type \((\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}F,\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}\beta)\) on \(\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}M\) which are \(\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}\)-lifts of some field \(\lambda\) of transverse geometric objects of type \((F,\beta)\) on \(M\) up to an \(\mathbb{A}\)-bundle automorphism of \(\mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}M\) induced by some section \(\alpha:M\rightarrow \mathrm{T}^{\mathbb{A}}_{\mathrm{tr}}M\). This result is then illustrated with an example of a linear connection on \(M\).
    0 references
    Weil algebra
    0 references
    geometric object
    0 references
    Lie jet
    0 references
    Weil bundle
    0 references
    transverse bundle
    0 references

    Identifiers