An indecomposable continuum as subpower Higson corona (Q2631604)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
An indecomposable continuum as subpower Higson corona
scientific article

    Statements

    An indecomposable continuum as subpower Higson corona (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    15 May 2019
    0 references
    A metric space is called proper if all its closed balls are compact. For a proper metric space $(X,d)$, the author considers in ZFC the following compactifications of $(X, d)$: the Higson compactification $h_H(X)$, the subpower Higson compactification $h_P(X)$ and the sublinear Higson compactification $h_L(X)$. Then $h_L(X)\preccurlyeq h_P(X)\preccurlyeq h_H(X)$ where $\preccurlyeq$ is the standard partial order between Hausdorff compactifications. For $A\in\{H, P, L\}$, the remainder $v_A X=h_A(X)\setminus X$ is called the Higson-type corona of $X$. In particular, $v_H X$ is the Higson corona of $X$, $v_P X$ is the subpower Higson corona of $X$, and $v_L X$ is the sublinear Higson corona of $X$. Let us denote by $[0, +\infty)$ the metric space $([0, +\infty), d)$ where $d(x,y)=\vert x-y\vert$ for all $x,y\in [0,+\infty)$. The author proves that the subpower Higson corona $v_P[0, +\infty)$ of $[0, +\infty)$ is a non-metrizable indecomposable continuum and, for each $A\in\{H, P, L\}$, there exists a continuous surjection from $v_P [0, +\infty)$ onto the compactification $h_A([0, +\infty))$. Using the example given on pages 183--184 in [\textit{Y. Iwamoto} and \textit{K. Tomoyasu}, Tsukuba J. Math. 25, No. 1, 179--186 (2001; Zbl 1017.54014)], the author shows that there is a proper metric $\rho$ on the interval $[0,+\infty)$ equivalent to $d$ such that the subpower Higson corona of the metric space $([0, +\infty), \rho)$ is a decomposable continuum. Among the open problems posed in the article, there is the following question: Is the sublinear Higson corona of $[0, +\infty)$ an indecomposable continuum? \par Reviewer's remark: Unfortunately, Corollary 2.5 is false. Perhaps, the author intended to formulate Corollary 2.5 as follows: Let $Y$ be a closed subset of a proper metric space $(X, d)$. If $Y$ is $R$-dense in $(X, d)$ for some positive real number $R$, then, for the closure $\overline{Y}$ of $Y$ in $h_P(X)$, the equality $\overline{Y}\setminus Y=v_P X$ holds, so $v_P Y$ is homeomorphic with $v_P X$.
    0 references
    0 references
    subpower Higson compactification
    0 references
    sublinear Higson compactification
    0 references
    Higson compactification
    0 references
    Higson-type corona
    0 references
    Čech-Stone compactification
    0 references
    indecomposable continuum
    0 references
    proper metric space
    0 references
    the space of non-negative real numbers
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references