On the constant in the definition of subexponential distributions (Q2711132)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On the constant in the definition of subexponential distributions |
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On the constant in the definition of subexponential distributions |
scientific article |
Statements
2 May 2001
0 references
subexponential distribution
0 references
0.9050293
0 references
0.89436024
0 references
0.8932427
0 references
0.89155096
0 references
0.88864714
0 references
On the constant in the definition of subexponential distributions (English)
0 references
A distribution \(G\) on \([0, +\infty)\) is said to be subexponential if it does not have a compact support, if for every \(y > 0\), \(\lim_{x \to +\infty} G([x+y, +\infty))/G([x, +\infty)) = 1\), and if \(\lim_{x \to +\infty} G*G([x, +\infty))/G([x, +\infty)) = c\) for some constant \(c\). Those distributions were introduced by \textit{V. P. Chistyakov} [Theory Probab. Appl. 9, 640-648 (1964); translation from Teor. Veroyatn. Primen. 9, 710-718 (1964; Zbl 0203.19401)]. In this paper the author proves that the constant \(c\) is necessarily equal to 2. The arguments use some Banach algebra methods, but mostly hinge upon some old and elementary results of \textit{W. Rudin} [Ann. Probab. 1, 982-994 (1973; Zbl 0303.60014)]. It is to be noted that the proof is very different according to \(G\) admitting a first moment or not.
0 references